![]() |
| Home | Forums | Carseat Basics | FAQ | LATCH | Free Carseat Inspection | Site Index |
|
The trend for families is to buy vehicles than can seat more than 5 passengers. Most of these vehicles have three rows of seating, but not all of them are equal in terms of safety. Many larger vehicles lack important crash test results and some have a relatively high risk of rollover. Not many vehicles with three rows of seating have side curtain airbags for all rows; even fewer deploy them when a rollover is detected. An equally important new safety feature is stability control, which is proving to help drivers avoid crashes in these larger vehicles that often have inferior handling compared to passenger cars. Don't assume the largest, heaviest vehicles are safest. According to IIHS death statistics, once a vehicle is over 4000 pounds, additional weight does not significantly reduce the risk of fatalities in a multi-vehicle crash. Most large sport utility vehicles do not get top ratings in the NHTSA and IIHS frontal crash tests and many others have no crash test results. Rear impacts can be dangerous to third row passengers. Fortunately, severe rear-end impacts are relatively uncommon. Only around 5% to 7% of fatalities occur in rear-enders. The main risk is to heavy adults who might cause the vehicle seat back to fail in a serious crash. This risk is even greater if the adults don't have head restraints and shoulder belts. If you will regularly carry adults in a third row, insist on features like head restraints and 3-point lap/shoulder seatbelts in ALL rear seating positions. Lap-only belts are not safe for adults or children in boosters, in any type of crash. On the other hand, kids in harnessed child seats or high back boosters are at much less risk in a third row. They are much lighter, and less likely to load the vehicle seat back mechanism to failure. The shell of their restraints should also provide some protection from intrusion as well as adequate head restraint to prevent whiplash injuries. Even safer, a child restraint with a 5-point harness can reduce the risk of ejection. For a child using an appropriate restraint, the center of the third row is usually a safer choice than an outside seat in the second row. Some vehicles lack shoulder belts in the rear center position, so a child using a booster could not be seated there. In these cases, if permitted by the vehicle owner's manual, a child restraint with a 5-point harness can usually be installed with just a lap belt, though a top-tether is always recommended for additional safety. Finally, vehicles with well over a foot of space between the 3rd row seat and rear hatch may have an advantage over those with just a few inches separating passengers from the rear of the vehicle. Please research carefully if safety is a main concern in your choice of a vehicle for your family. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), motor vehicle crashes remain the leading cause of death for people aged 4 to 33 years, exceeding most other causes combined. Each year in the United States, more than 1.5 million children under age 16 are occupants in motor vehicle crashes, resulting in more than 1,700 fatalities and 240,000 non-fatal injuries. Please, protect your family with a safe vehicle, be sure to properly restrain all passengers and always drive unimpaired with your full attention on the road. These few easy choices significantly reduce the chance of death or serious injury on the roads. |
Crash Test Results and Safety Features for the Safest Model Year 2006/2007 Vehicles With Third Row Seating
The requirements to make the list of the safest vehicles with three rows of seating are very tough, but also very straightforward. Side curtain airbags for all three rows of seating must be at least optional on some trim level and consumers should insist on this feature if it is not standard. Rollover side curtain airbags that detect and deploy in rollover crashes are an added plus. A stability control system must also be available for a vehicle to make this list. Again, consumers must be sure to purchase the correct option package or trim level to get this feature on some models. To further narrow down the field, a vehicle must have top ratings in the widely available crash tests, if tested. That means "5-stars" in the both NHTSA frontal crash tests, both NHTSA side impact crash tests and "Good" ratings in the IIHS frontal offset and side impact crash tests. Vehicles missing any of these test results will only be considered as "Promising," as long as they have all the other required safety features. Fatal rear-end crashes are not common, only around 5%-7% of all fatal crashes. Despite the low risk of death in rear-end crashes, whiplash is a common injury from less severe rear impacts. Because of this, special credit will be given to the very few models that get top ratings in the new IIHS rear crash test or have proven active head restraint systems.
| Year | Make | Model | Type | Chassis | # | IO | IS | ND | NP | NF | NR | RR | SA | SB | HR | SC | AW | RA | SH | RT | RS | AH | Notes |
| 2006 | Acura | MDX | SUV | Unibody | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | S | O | N | Recommended | |
| 2007 | Chevrolet | Tahoe | SUV | Truck | 7/8/9 | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | Y | ? | ? | Y | O | Y | ? | ? | O | ? | Preliminary | |
| 2006 | Dodge | Durango | SUV | Truck | 7 | NT | 5 | 5 | NT | NT | 3 | Y | Y | Y | O | O | N | ? | ? | ? | N | Promising | |
| 2007 | GMC | Yukon | SUV | Truck | 7/8/9 | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | Y | ? | ? | Y | O | Y | ? | ? | O | ? | Preliminary | |
| 2006 | Honda | Pilot | SUV | Unibody | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Y | Y | Y | Y | O | Y | Y | O | O | N | Promising | ||
| 2006 | Honda | Odyssey | Minivan | Unibody | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | O | O | N | Recommended |
| 2006 | Jeep | Commander | SUV | Hybrid | 7 | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | Y | N | N | Y | O | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Promising | |
| 2006 | Kia | Sedona | Minivan | Unibody | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | O | Y | Recommended |
| 2006 | Land Rover | LR3 | SUV | Hybrid | 7 | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | ? | ? | N | Promising | |
| 2006 | Mercedes | R-Class | SUV | Unibody | 6 | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | ? | Y | ? | ? | Promising | |
| 2006 | Nissan | Quest | Minivan | Unibody | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Y | Y | Y | O | N | N | Y | Y | O | N | Recommended |
| 2006 | Volvo | XC90 | SUV | Unibody | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | O | Y | Recommended | |
| Year | Make | Model | Type | Chassis | # | IO | IS | ND | NP | NF | NR | RR | SA | SB | HR | SC | AW | RA | SH | RT | RS | AH | Notes |
|
Key:
|
| Car-Safety.Org: Vehicle and Carseat Safety | About / Support Us |